> > So, what should the behavior be of a constant declared as
> > CHAR 'hi'
> > ? Right now it fails, since SQL9x asks that the char type defaults to a
> > length of one and our parser does not distinguish between usage as a
> > constant declaration and as a column definition (where you would want
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, what should the behavior be of a constant declared as
> CHAR 'hi'
> ? Right now it fails, since SQL9x asks that the char type defaults to a
> length of one and our parser does not distinguish between usage as a
> constant declaration and as a colu
So, what should the behavior be of a constant declared as
CHAR 'hi'
? Right now it fails, since SQL9x asks that the char type defaults to a
length of one and our parser does not distinguish between usage as a
constant declaration and as a column definition (where you would want
the "char(1)" to
