Thomas Munro writes:
> Even though the following is coincidentally meaningful, I don't think
> it was intentional or is useful:
> postgres=# update foo set x = DEFAULT
Uh, seems perfectly sane to me. Why should we assume that can't be
what the user wants?
regards, tom l
Hi,
Even though the following is coincidentally meaningful, I don't think
it was intentional or is useful:
postgres=# update foo set x = DEFAULT
Shouldn't that completion should be suppressed, like in the attached?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
fix-update-set-completion.patch
D
