On Apr 16, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why in the world is reindex_relation defined like this?
>
> #define REINDEX_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS0x1
> #define REINDEX_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE0x2
> extern bool reindex_relation(Oid relid, bool toast_too, int flags);
>
> Seems like a rational design
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:52:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why in the world is reindex_relation defined like this?
>
> #define REINDEX_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS 0x1
> #define REINDEX_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE0x2
> extern bool reindex_relation(Oid relid, bool toast_too, int flags);
>
> Seems like a rati
Why in the world is reindex_relation defined like this?
#define REINDEX_CHECK_CONSTRAINTS 0x1
#define REINDEX_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE 0x2
extern bool reindex_relation(Oid relid, bool toast_too, int flags);
Seems like a rational design would have folded toast_too in as another
flag bit, inst
