Oh, that's right. I had forgotten that it wasn't for general PostgreSQL
use. Since it's a ecpg deal only, I guess I remove my objection.
Greg
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto
Greg Copeland wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto? It will be a
> matter of weeks before distros offer this as an upgrade package let
> alone months before distros offer this as a standard. Seems like these
> changes are ideal for a
Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto?
We don't have a whole lot of choice, unless you prefer releasing a
broken or crippled ecpg with 7.3.
In practice this only affects people who pull sources from CVS, anyway.
If you use a tarball
Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto? It will be a
matter of weeks before distros offer this as an upgrade package let
alone months before distros offer this as a standard. Seems like these
changes are ideal for a release after next (7.5/7.6) as enough time will
of gone by f
Hi,
I just learned that bison 1.50 was released on Oct. 5th and it indeed
compiles ecpg just nicely on my machine. Could we please install this on
our main machine and merge the ecpg.big branch back into main?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GN
