Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread Jan Wieck
Darren Johnson wrote: > The group communication system doesn't just run on one system. For > postgres-r using spread The reason why group communication software is used is simply because this software is designed with two goals in mind: 1) optimize bandwidth usage 2) make many-to-many communic

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread Al Sutton
PROTECTED]>; "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 9:17 PM Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 item

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread Al Sutton
>; "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

Re: [MLIST] Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread Al Sutton
ot;Darren Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 2:29 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [MLIST] Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread David Walker
mjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 6:48 PM > Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replic

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-15 Thread Al Sutton
: "Darren Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-14 Thread Darren Johnson
b) The Group Communication blob will consist of a number of processes which need to talk to all of the others to interrogate them for changes which may conflict with the current write that being handled and then issue the transaction response. This is basically the two phase commit solution with

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-14 Thread Al Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Darren Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 14,

Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-14 Thread Mathieu Arnold
--En cette belle journée de samedi 14 décembre 2002 11:59 -0500, -- Bruce Momjian écrivait avec ses petits doigts : > > This sounds like two-phase commit. While it will work, it is probably > slower than Postgres-R's method. What exactly is Postgres-R's method ? -- Mathieu Arnold ---

Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
This sounds like two-phase commit. While it will work, it is probably slower than Postgres-R's method. --- Al Sutton wrote: > For live replication could I propose that we consider the systems A,B, and C > connected to each o

Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items - Replication

2002-12-14 Thread Al Sutton
For live replication could I propose that we consider the systems A,B, and C connected to each other independantly (i.e. A has links to B and C, B has links to A and C, and C has links to A and B), and that replication is handled by the node receiving the write based transaction. If we consider a