Am 07.11.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Pushed. I took the opportunity to fix the const-ness annotation of the
> function result type, too.
Great, thank you!
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
Lars Kanis writes:
> Thank you for the quick response! Attached the last minute - now or
> never patch to change the function name.
Pushed. I took the opportunity to fix the const-ness annotation of the
function result type, too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-ha
Lars Kanis writes:
> Thank you for the quick response! Attached the last minute - now or
> never patch to change the function name.
Ah, thanks for doing the legwork. It's pretty late in the day Heikki's
time, so I'll review and hopefully push this.
regards, tom lane
--
Tom Lane writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> The question is, do we want to still change it? It's a new function in
>> 9.5, and we're just about to enter beta, so I guess we could, although
>> there might already be applications out there using it. If we do want to
>> rename it, now is the
Thank you for the quick response! Attached the last minute - now or
never patch to change the function name.
In addition I perceived a small inconsistency with the naming of the
SGML id of PQsslAttribute. This is addressed in the second patch file.
--
Kind Regards,
Lars
From 5b7f116de237df540493
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 11/06/2015 11:31 PM, Lars Kanis wrote:
>> As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to
>> bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder
>> whether PQsslAttributes() is the best name for the function. Based on
>> thi
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Thoughts? I'm leaning towards changing it now.
+1 to the idea of changing it.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/m
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 11:31 PM, Lars Kanis wrote:
>
>> As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to
>> bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder
>> whether PQsslAttributes() is the best nam
On 11/06/2015 11:31 PM, Lars Kanis wrote:
As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to
bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder
whether PQsslAttributes() is the best name for the function. Based on
this name, I would expect to get key+value
As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to
bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder
whether PQsslAttributes() is the best name for the function. Based on
this name, I would expect to get key+value pairs instead of only the
keys. IMHO PQsslAt
10 matches
Mail list logo
