On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Agreed. Anybody up for writing the text though? There was some text
> earlier (see
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgweb.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd02e36141bb99e9ee4e0b80fd69464e0e6d91b7#patch18
> or the corresponding one in the old pgweb r
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Heya all
>>
>> It seems like it's a bit trickier to find beta downloads than might be
>> ideal.
>>
>> The beta info page simply reads:
>>
>> " PostgreSQL 9.2 beta 3 was released on Aug
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Heya all
>
> It seems like it's a bit trickier to find beta downloads than might be
> ideal.
>
> The beta info page simply reads:
>
> " PostgreSQL 9.2 beta 3 was released on August 6, 2012."
>
> with no information about how to obtain a bu
Heya all
It seems like it's a bit trickier to find beta downloads than might be
ideal.
The beta info page simply reads:
" PostgreSQL 9.2 beta 3 was released on August 6, 2012."
with no information about how to obtain a build or the sources, not even
a link to the downloads page, despite
> I see a lot of this when I'm importing data :
>
> DEBUG: copy: line 2865, XLogWrite: new log file created -
> try to increase WAL_FILES
>
> Is that anything to be concerned about?
No, WAL_FILES affects performance only.
> Do I need to increase WAL_FILES? If so, how?
You may ignore this fo
Hey guys, I am just getting back into the swing of things (after a nice
vacation and a not-so-nice move across country).. I just installed 7.1 Beta
3 and am playing with it (I'm impressed with the speed increase I've seen
with virtually no tweaking BTW).. I see a lot of this when I'm importing
dat
