It seems that the suggestion to fill intermediate positions with
NULLs would be preferable to the current behavior.
I know of no requirement to populate arrays in sequence in any other
language so I think other programmers would be surprised too by the
current behavior.
Paul
Tom Lane wrot
[ expanding this thread, as it now needs wider discussion ]
"Paul B. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I was not filling all of the arrays in sequential order. I
> added code to initialize them in order and the function seems to be
> working now. Is that a known problem?
Well
