On Tuesday 14 July 2009 21:17:14 Josh Berkus wrote:
> > == Announcing ==
> > Announce to:
> > * PostgreSQL News
> > * pgsql-hackers
> > * pgsql-general(?)
> > * pgsql-packagers
>
> Also pgsql-announce, no?
Yes.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make change
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 21:20:51 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Also, what about producing Docs?
I'm working on making the documentation build part of the normal release
building rules.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.
On 7/13/09 12:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
* Release notes [Note: We'll have to work out exactly how to do this one as we
go.]
I am not planning to assist with this item for alpha releases.
Anyone want to volunteer to organize the alpha release notes? This
seems like
== Announcing ==
Announce to:
* PostgreSQL News
* pgsql-hackers
* pgsql-general(?)
* pgsql-packagers
Also pgsql-announce, no?
I'm happy to write announcements. I'm also happy to give someone else
some practice ... I'll see if anyone is interested on -advocacy.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Ex
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane escribi?:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> > > What would be really nice is to provide an easy and PORTABLE way for
> > > patch submitters to run pgindent themselves.
> >
> > AFAIK it's just BSD indent plus some private patches of Bruce's, so
> > there's no good reason w
Tom Lane escribió:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > What would be really nice is to provide an easy and PORTABLE way for
> > patch submitters to run pgindent themselves.
>
> AFAIK it's just BSD indent plus some private patches of Bruce's, so
> there's no good reason we couldn't distribute pgindent in so
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > What would be really nice is to provide an easy and PORTABLE way for
> > patch submitters to run pgindent themselves.
>
> AFAIK it's just BSD indent plus some private patches of Bruce's, so
> there's no good reason we couldn't distribute pgindent in sourc
Robert Haas writes:
> What would be really nice is to provide an easy and PORTABLE way for
> patch submitters to run pgindent themselves.
AFAIK it's just BSD indent plus some private patches of Bruce's, so
there's no good reason we couldn't distribute pgindent in source form.
There just hasn't be
Robert Haas escribió:
> What would be really nice is to provide an easy and PORTABLE way for
> patch submitters to run pgindent themselves. Then you can pgindent on
> every commit, and if you break somebody's patch series, it's there own
> fault for not pgindenting it correctly before they submit
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> It will mostly look like a beta release
>
>> No pgindent run I assume?
>
> No, that would tend to break pending patches.
>
> There's been some talk of pgindenting just new code added by patc
On Monday 13 July 2009 22:47:40 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > == Release preparation ==
> > src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES applies
>
> No library soname bumps, right?
The soname, which is name + major version number, is only bumped when the ABI
changes.
Perhaps you refer to the
On Monday 13 July 2009 22:49:21 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > It will mostly look like a beta release
> >
> > No pgindent run I assume?
>
> I don't think so.
No, certainly not.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> It will mostly look like a beta release
> No pgindent run I assume?
No, that would tend to break pending patches.
There's been some talk of pgindenting just new code added by patches
at the time they're committed. We don't seem to have th
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > == Release preparation ==
> > src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES applies
>
> No library soname bumps, right?
No, I doubt it.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If you
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > It will mostly look like a beta release
>
> No pgindent run I assume?
I don't think so.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, C
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> * Release notes [Note: We'll have to work out exactly how to do this one as
> we
> go.]
I am not planning to assist with this item for alpha releases.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> == Release preparation ==
> src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES applies
No library soname bumps, right?
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It will mostly look like a beta release
No pgindent run I assume?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
For those of you who weren't involved in the Ottawa developer meeting, I think
we should start by explaining that beginning with the 8.5 development cycle,
we are planning to make regular alpha releases, to make early testing easier
for more users. This will happen at the end of every commit fe
19 matches
Mail list logo
