On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Matthew Altus wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time,
> > I
> > kept typing a different word instead of rollback. So I created a patch to
> > accept this word as an alias
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Matthew Altus wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time,
> >> I
> >> kept typing a different word instead of rollback. ?So I created a patch to
> >> accept th
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Matthew Altus wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
>> kept typing a different word instead of rollback. So I created a patch to
>> accept this word as an alias for rollback. Obvi
Matthew Altus wrote:
> Hey,
>
> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
> kept typing a different word instead of rollback. So I created a patch to
> accept this word as an alias for rollback. Obviously it's not part of the
> sql
> standard, but could be
On Mar 31, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Matthew Altus wrote:
> After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
> kept typing a different word instead of rollback. So I created a patch to
> accept this word as an alias for rollback. Obviously it's not part of the
> sql
> sta
Hey,
After dealing with a production fault and having to rollback all the time, I
kept typing a different word instead of rollback. So I created a patch to
accept this word as an alias for rollback. Obviously it's not part of the sql
standard, but could be a nice extension for postgresql. Se