On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> The size hint I chose is fairly arbitrary. Any suggestions for principled
>> alternatives?
>
> Based on your test results, it doesn't seem like it matters very much
> what you put in ther
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> The size hint I chose is fairly arbitrary. Any suggestions for principled
> alternatives?
Based on your test results, it doesn't seem like it matters very much
what you put in there, so I'm inclined to think that num_mcelem is
fine. I thought
Both $SUBJECT functions pass to hash_create() an expected hash table size of
1 * attstattarget. Based on header comments, this represents a near-worst
case. These typanalyze functions scan the hash tables sequentially, thereby
visiting the entire allocation. Per the recommendation in comment
