Re: [HACKERS] Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!

2000-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ? It looks like -ansi would cause gcc to reject // comments, but -ansi has enough not-so-desirable side effects that I would vote against making that switch part of our st

Re: [HACKERS] Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!

2000-11-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied. [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ? > > Andreas > > *** ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c.orig Wed Nov 1 10:00:22 2000 > --- ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c Tue Nov 7 11:07:28 2000 >

[HACKERS] Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!

2000-11-07 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ? Andreas *** ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c.orig Wed Nov 1 10:00:22 2000 --- ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.cTue Nov 7 11:07:28 2000 *** *** 1212,1218 is_match