On lör, 2010-07-24 at 20:32 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
> Attached is the revised version of the patch addressing all the
> issues
> raised in the review, except for the use of AexprConst and c_expr.
> With
> my limited knowledge of bison I've failed to resolve the shift/reduce
> errors that are i
On 21/07/10 08:33, Mike Fowler wrote:
Why is the first argument AexprConst instead of a_expr? The SQL
standard says it's a character string literal, but I think we can very
well allow arbitrary expressions.
Yes, it was AexprConst because of the specification. I also found that
using it solved
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 20/07/10 19:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Attached is a patch with the revised XMLEXISTS function, complete with
grammar support and regression tests. The implemented grammar is:
XMLEXISTS ( xpath_expression PASSING BY REF xml_value [BY REF] )
Though the f
On tis, 2010-06-29 at 12:22 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
> Mike Fowler wrote:
> > Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the
> > pg_proc entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the
> > grammar out it was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.
> >
> > Attache
Mike Fowler wrote:
Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the
pg_proc entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the
grammar out it was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.
Attached is a patch with the revised XMLEXISTS function, complete with
grammar s
Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the pg_proc
entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the grammar out it
was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.
Glad it was a helpfu
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
> Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the pg_proc
> entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the grammar out it
> was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.
Glad it was a helpful suggestion.
> Attached
and finally in pg_proc.h I have:
DATA(insert OID = 3037 ( xmlexists PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 f f f t f i 3 0
16 "25 142" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ xml_exists _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
DESCR("evaluate XPath expression in a boolean context");
It looks like the pg_proc entry is creating an
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
> Thanks Robert, I've managed to resolve this make making a type cast inside
> gram.y. However, it now seems that the function itself can not be found.
> I've made an entry in pg_proc.h, but when running psql I'm getting the
> following:
>
> xmlt
Robert Haas wrote:
I usually troubleshoot things like this by setting a breakpoint in
elog_start or elog_finish. Then you can see where it's blowing up.
Off the top of my head, I would guess you've added a node type whose
structure definition doesn't begin with NodeTag, or else you've got a
mem
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
>
>> Look at how the POSITION() pseudofunction is defined around gram.y
>> line 9651. Essentially any special syntax of this type gets converted
>> to a regular function call internally. So in your case I think there
>> will be some function th
Look at how the POSITION() pseudofunction is defined around gram.y
line 9651. Essentially any special syntax of this type gets converted
to a regular function call internally. So in your case I think there
will be some function that gets called something ike this:
xmlexists(xpath_expression,
Robert Haas writes:
> Look at how the POSITION() pseudofunction is defined around gram.y
> line 9651. Essentially any special syntax of this type gets converted
> to a regular function call internally. So in your case I think there
> will be some function that gets called something ike this:
>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Mike Fowler wrote:
> I've been working to improve the syntax of the XMLEXISTS function that I put
> a patch forward for and have been attempting to get my head around how you
> modify the grammar. I admit I'm not getting much anywhere probably as I
> don't know biso
Hi,
I've been working to improve the syntax of the XMLEXISTS function that I
put a patch forward for and have been attempting to get my head around
how you modify the grammar. I admit I'm not getting much anywhere
probably as I don't know bison but I'm starting to wonder if it's worth
the pai
15 matches
Mail list logo
