Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before,
> but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or
> somebody has been working on it?
Hi, I'm rewriting the patch that I proposed before.
(http://archives.
Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before,
> but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or
> somebody has been working on it?
> Sorry, just to repeat myself. Char types will benefit from that.
I
To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before,
but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or
somebody has been working on it?
Sorry, just to repeat myself. Char types will benefit from that. Many
applications are from DB2, Oracle or SQL Serve
