Re: [HACKERS] About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

2009-03-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now > >> included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we > >> should make 8.3 do likewise. > > > Here's a patch for this. > > Oh, thanks, I was ju

Re: [HACKERS] About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

2009-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now >> included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we >> should make 8.3 do likewise. > Here's a patch for this. Oh, thanks, I was just about to go off and do that mys

Re: [HACKERS] About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

2009-03-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now > included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we > should make 8.3 do likewise. Here's a patch for this. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ Post

Re: [HACKERS] About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

2009-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes: > I was trying to make a scratch build in Koji for orafce package, and it > failed: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1235602&name=build.log > I consulted #fedora-devel @ Freenode, and the conclusion was this: > devrimgunduz: the dev