Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian :
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z :
> >> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> >> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
> >> >>
> >> >> I was wondering if it would cause package management
2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian :
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z :
>> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
>> >>
>> >> I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
>> >> people who h
Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z :
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
> >>
> >> I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
> >> people who had already modified their postgresq
2010/9/27 Alvaro Herrera :
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010:
>
>>
>> (Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.)
>>
>
> Did you use git cherry-pick?
Yes!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent vi
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010:
>
> (Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.)
>
Did you use git cherry-pick?
--
Álvaro Herrera
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Se
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
>>
>> I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
>> people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.
>
> We don't overwrite
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
>
> I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
> people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.
We don't overwrite .conf files during upgrades.
--
D
2010/9/27 Guillaume Lelarge :
> Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit :
>> 2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
>>> Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
>>> require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit :
> 2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
>> Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
>> require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
>
> I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
> master branch.
>
+1 for backpat
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
> require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
master branch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterpri
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~li
11 matches
Mail list logo