Robert Haas wrote:
> It might be better to document this in bgworker.sgml instead. That
> already documents some facts about exiting:
>
>
>If bgw_restart_time for a background worker is
>configured as BGW_NEVER_RESTART, or if it exits with an exit
>code of 0 or is terminated by Te
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Piotr Stefaniak
wrote:
> On 2016-06-29 18:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>> This code predates be7558162acc5578d0b2cf0c8d4c76b6076ce352, prior to
>> which proc_exit(0) forced an immediate, unconditional restart. It's
>> true that, given that commit, changing this code to
On 2016-06-29 18:58, Robert Haas wrote:
This code predates be7558162acc5578d0b2cf0c8d4c76b6076ce352, prior to
which proc_exit(0) forced an immediate, unconditional restart. It's
true that, given that commit, changing this code to do proc_exit(0)
instead of proc_exit(1) would be harmless. Howeve
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
>> wrote:
while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
cosmetic improvements there. You can see t
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
> wrote:
>>> while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
>>> cosmetic improvements there. You can see them in the attached diff file.
>>
>> Revised patch attached.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
wrote:
>> while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
>> cosmetic improvements there. You can see them in the attached diff file.
>
> Revised patch attached.
The first hunk of this corrects an outdated comment, so we shou
On 2016-05-16 21:40, Piotr Stefaniak wrote:
Hello,
while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
cosmetic improvements there. You can see them in the attached diff file.
Revised patch attached.
commit 3ff1afa84e4bc22f153c876e2f0588327a8a004e
Author: Piotr Stefaniak
D
On 2016-05-17 19:05, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Paquier writes:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
wrote:
-toc_bytes = offsetof(shm_toc, toc_entry) +nentry * sizeof(shm_toc_entry)
+toc_bytes = offsetof(shm_toc, toc_entry) + nentry * sizeof(shm_toc_entry)
+ allocated
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
> wrote:
> -toc_bytes = offsetof(shm_toc, toc_entry) +nentry * sizeof(shm_toc_entry)
> +toc_bytes = offsetof(shm_toc, toc_entry) + nentry * sizeof(shm_toc_entry)
> + allocated_bytes;
> I don't recall the
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Piotr Stefaniak
wrote:
> while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
> cosmetic improvements there. You can see them in the attached diff file.
-toc_bytes = offsetof(shm_toc, toc_entry) +nentry * sizeof(shm_toc_entry)
+toc_bytes
Hello,
while investigating the shm_mq code and its testing module I made some
cosmetic improvements there. You can see them in the attached diff file.
commit 0e202cb6e0eca2e7fb3e1353b550f3d2ace9680e
Author: Piotr Stefaniak
Date: Thu Apr 28 18:36:16 2016 +0200
Cosmetic improvements around
11 matches
Mail list logo
