"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is a GUC. It's exactly like max_backends. I took the easy route out and
> just followed where DEF_MAXBACKENDS was being set rather than hard wiring
> the value any where.
Oh. Well, skip the configure part: the only reason there's still a
config
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for default superuser reserved number of connections])
> > + PGAC_ARG_REQ(with, reservedbackends, [ --with-reservedbackends=Nset default
>superuser reserved number of connections [2]
"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for default superuser reserved number of connections])
> + PGAC_ARG_REQ(with, reservedbackends, [ --with-reservedbackends=Nset default
>superuser reserved number of connections [2]],
> + [],
> + [wi
Helps if I attach the patch...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:36:19 +0100 (BST)
From: Nigel J. Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A configure.in patch check
Would someone apply the attached patch to the development source and let me
