On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> We're now at the "nearly done" stage of the first 9.5 CF.
>
> Twenty-four patches have been committed so far, and five more are ready
> for committer (and of those, four are small). Thirty patches are still
> marked "needs revie
Hi.
We're now at the "nearly done" stage of the first 9.5 CF.
Twenty-four patches have been committed so far, and five more are ready
for committer (and of those, four are small). Thirty patches are still
marked "needs review", and twenty-one are waiting on author.
I'll go through the patches an
At 2014-07-02 10:44:23 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> Miscellaneous
> -
>
> contrib/fastbloat - tool for quickly assessing bloat stats for a table
> Pending review by Jaime.
>
> showing index update time on EXPLAIN
> Pending updated patch by Jaime.
>
> idle_in_transac
At 2014-07-02 10:54:05 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> Functions
> -
>
> min/max support for inet datatypes
> Pending review by Muhammad Asif Naeem.
No updates.
> Selectivity estimation for inet operators
> Dilip Kumar plans to post a review this week.
Reviewed, and updat
At 2014-07-02 11:09:19 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> System administration
> -
>
> pg_hibernator
> Nice feature, some discussion, no code reviews. Status not entirely
> clear, but updated patch available.
Now being reviewed by MauMau.
> Monitoring & control
>
At 2014-07-02 11:14:52 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> Security
>
>
> Row-security based on Updatable security barrier views
> Lots of discussion that I haven't dared to look at properly yet. I
> gather there's still plenty of design-level work needed, and this
> is not
At 2014-07-02 11:21:53 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> SQL commands
>
>
> Event triggers: object creation support
> Enormous patch, no reviews, no reviewers, but it's known to work
> already. Does anyone want to have a look at this? (I thought it
> was being reviewe
>> Custom Plan API
>> Shigeru Hanada has said he plans to post a design review soon.
>
> Any updates? Should this be moved to the next CF?
>
Now I'm working to revise the patch according to his suggestion;
will be completed within a couple of days.
A few issues needs design-level suggestion fro
At 2014-07-02 11:38:31 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> Performance
> ---
>
> scalable LWLocks
> Generic atomics implementation
> Both under active discussion.
Work continues on these.
> KNN-GiST with recheck
> Partial sort
> Some earlier discussion, but no conclusions, and
At 2014-07-02 10:36:23 +0530, a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> Server features
> ---
>
> Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls
> Latest patch currently pending review by Jeff and Álvaro. No
> updates so far.
Jeff has posted a review, and is working on the patch further.
Hi.
We're into the last full week of this CommitFest. Here's an update on
the current state of the queue.
Needs review: 31
Waiting on author: 18
Ready for committer:13
Committed: 19
(I'll send separate topic-wise updates too.)
Reviewers, please tr
At 2014-07-02 11:19:10 -0400, sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
>
> I'd be fine leaving this open for now at least ('waiting on author'
> perhaps) and then bumping it to August only if necessary.
Since there's active discussion/development happening, I wasn't planning
to change the status anyway. It looks
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> Minmax indexes
> Álvaro will respond to the design questions Heikki raised.
I'm currently reworking the patch so that things that need to be
abstract per discussion are abstract, without enlarging the scope
excessively. I'm working on an opclass implementation that
* Abhijit Menon-Sen (a...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> Row-security based on Updatable security barrier views
> Lots of discussion that I haven't dared to look at properly yet. I
> gather there's still plenty of design-level work needed, and this
> is not in any imminent danger of being co
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> Spread shared memory across NUMA memory nodes
> Marked waiting on author, but status unclear. Any updates?
The review was a little sparse:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADyhKSXs+oUetngSbeiM0tVSRy=QeCaSNBQBDbM=sfqtdg+...@mail.gmail.com
In particular, there
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
wrote:
> KNN-GiST with recheck
> Partial sort
> Some earlier discussion, but no conclusions, and as far as I know
> nobody is working on these patches at the moment.
>
I'm now working on next revision of KNN-GiST with recheck. Also, I th
(2014/07/02 18:19), Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Thanks for the update. I have marked the patch "returned with feedback"
and moved it to the 2014-08 CF.
OK I've changed the status from "returned with feedback" to "Waiting on
Author".
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hack
Thanks for the update. I have marked the patch "returned with feedback"
and moved it to the 2014-08 CF.
-- Abhijit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
(2014/07/02 14:06), Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Foreign table inheritance
Moved from ready for committer back to waiting on author after
Noah's review comments. Should we expect an updated patch to be
posted in this CF?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20140702022327.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
wrote:
> WAL format & API changes
> I'm not sure what's happening here. Will look more closely, but
> updates are welcome from the people who've been participating in
> the discussion/review.
>
Patch has been reviewed once. Heikki has
Performance
---
scalable LWLocks
Generic atomics implementation
Both under active discussion.
KNN-GiST with recheck
Partial sort
Some earlier discussion, but no conclusions, and as far as I know
nobody is working on these patches at the moment.
lowering array_agg memory requi
SQL commands
Event triggers: object creation support
Enormous patch, no reviews, no reviewers, but it's known to work
already. Does anyone want to have a look at this? (I thought it
was being reviewed, and didn't realise otherwise until a couple
of days ago. Sorry abou
Security
Row-security based on Updatable security barrier views
Lots of discussion that I haven't dared to look at properly yet. I
gather there's still plenty of design-level work needed, and this
is not in any imminent danger of being committed.
Replication & Recovery
--
System administration
-
pg_hibernator
Nice feature, some discussion, no code reviews. Status not entirely
clear, but updated patch available.
Monitoring & control
Reducing impact of hints/cleanup for SELECTs
Pending performance review by Emanu
Functions
-
min/max support for inet datatypes
Pending review by Muhammad Asif Naeem.
Selectivity estimation for inet operators
Dilip Kumar plans to post a review this week.
There are two "ready for committer" patches in this category.
Clients
---
Gaussian distribution pgbe
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> Using Levenshtein distance to HINT a candidate column name
> No real progress in any direction. Everyone wants the feature, but
> nobody is sure how many suggestions would be useful and how many
> would be annoying.
Expect a
Miscellaneous
-
contrib/fastbloat - tool for quickly assessing bloat stats for a table
Pending review by Jaime.
showing index update time on EXPLAIN
Pending updated patch by Jaime.
idle_in_transaction_session_timeout
Marked as ready for committer, but as far as I can tell
Hi.
Here's a detailed mid-week update split up by category. I've left out
patches marked returned/rejected, committed, or ready for committer.
Server features
---
Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls
Latest patch currently pending review by Jeff and Álvaro. No
updates
Hi.
We're two weeks into the CommitFest now, and things are moving along
quite nicely.
Fourteen patches have been committed, and twelve more are marked ready
for committer. But most importantly, many patches have been reviewed,
and only nine patches still lack a reviewer (and most of those have
s
Hi.
One week into the CommitFest, we now have nine committed patches, ten
ready for committer, fourteen waiting on their author, and fifty-nine
still awaiting review.
Thanks to all the people who submitted a review (and a special mention
for MauMau for reviewing the most patches so far, of which
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> wrote:
> >>> P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
> >>> easier to keep track of them.
>
> >> I and, I believe
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that gmail is incapable of threading messages
> using In-Reply-To/References header fields, especially given that mail
> subjects are changed all the time in the normal course of events. But
> I'll take your word for it and reply to the original
At 2014-06-17 12:47:19 -0400, alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> > > P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll
> > > be easier to keep track of them.
> >
> > I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
> > least in Gmail, it breaks the threading. It
On 2014-06-17 12:47:19 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> > wrote:
> > > P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
> > > easier to keep track of them.
> >
> > I and, I believe, various other people
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
>> wrote:
>>> P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
>>> easier to keep track of them.
>> I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
>> least in
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> wrote:
> > P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
> > easier to keep track of them.
>
> I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
> least in Gmail, it breaks the thread
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
> easier to keep track of them.
I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
least in Gmail, it breaks the threading. It is much easier to find
th
Hi.
There are 92 outstanding patches in this CommitFest, and 63 of them do
not have any reviewer. Those are very large numbers, so I hope everyone
will pitch in to keep things moving along.
There's quite a variety of patches available for review this time, and
any level of feedback about them is
38 matches
Mail list logo
