You should find that the next daily snapshot and beta3 will properly
detect Opteron/Itanium on your platform.
I don't think we can help you with the compiler bugs, however. ;-)
---
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [2003
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20030905 20:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Alternatively, find out what symbols your compiler predeclares.
> >If my theory is right then your pg_config_os.h file is failing to
> >define HAS_TEST_AND_SET; why?
>
> Indeed, pg_config_os.h does not set
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port. Or could I miss
> > something subtle here?
>
> This strengthens my suspicion that we're not finding TAS code for
> the Itanium, but please see if you can strace or ktrace the
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port. Or could I miss
> something subtle here?
This strengthens my suspicion that we're not finding TAS code for
the Itanium, but please see if you can strace or ktrace the postmaster
to verify how man
-On [20030905 19:12], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>It should not; there is something wrong here, not merely a documentation
>problem. I am wondering whether your 7.4 build fails to select a TAS()
>implementation --- if so, it would fall back to implementing spinlocks
>as semaphores, which
-On [20030905 20:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Alternatively, find out what symbols your compiler predeclares.
>If my theory is right then your pg_config_os.h file is failing to
>define HAS_TEST_AND_SET; why?
Indeed, pg_config_os.h does not set anything for __ia64__.
When I added defi
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it does seem 7.4 places higher demand than 7.3.4 on the SysV IPC,
It should not; there is something wrong here, not merely a documentation
problem. I am wondering whether your 7.4 build fails to select a TAS()
implementation --- if so, it wo
-On [20030905 18:32], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>If it dies even at max_connections 10, that is a *lower* setting than we
>ever supported before (the pre-7.4 default was 32, and you need 20 or
>more to run the parallel regression test). I suspect that you actually
>don't have SysV semaph
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Using a snapshot of September the 4th:
> creating template1 database in /p/scratch/asmodai/postgresql-snapshot/src/test/r
> egress/./tmp_check/data/base/1... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space
> left on device
> DETAIL: Failed sysca
-On [20030905 17:52], Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Actually the bug is in beta2, not beta1. I'd suggest grabbing the
>current nightly snapshot (see /dev on the ftp servers) in preference
>to beta2, if you are on a machine with small SysV IPC limits.
Using a snapshot of September the 4th:
-On [20030905 17:42], Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Is this beta 1 or beta 2? Beta 1 has a bug which may require more
>shared resources than what is available.
Sorry, beta 2. Should've made that clear.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9D
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> did 7.4 raise the bar on SysV IPC? On my other two boxes I haven't
>> tweaked SysV IPC at all (semmni is at 10) and I get initdb.
> Is this beta 1 or beta 2? Beta 1 has a bug which may require more
> shared resources than what is available.
Actually the
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 11:29, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20030905 17:22], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Well, on Itanium2 on FreeBSD 5.1 it compiles. I just need to get the
> >semaphores to a higher value in order to actually do an initdb.
>
> Though,
>
> did 7.4
-On [20030905 17:22], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Well, on Itanium2 on FreeBSD 5.1 it compiles. I just need to get the
>semaphores to a higher value in order to actually do an initdb.
Though,
did 7.4 raise the bar on SysV IPC? On my other two boxes I haven't
tweaked SysV
-On [20030905 16:42], Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Download 7.4 beta 2 and run regression tests on those platforms. Report
>back any issues or successes. 7.4 Release candidates will come with a
>call for reports on platforms that pass the regression tests which are
>used to make up the su
> I'm doing a research about DBMSs that run on new PC 64-bit processors, like
> Intel Itanium and AMD Opteron. I'd like that you would help me in some
> questions. First, does pgsql support this architecture? According to
> Administrator's
> Guide(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/supported
Hello,
I'm a beginner here at the list, my name is Daniel Pellegrini, graduation
student from Brazil with no experience about pgsql. First of all I'd like to
say that I have tried other lists before, but I didn't get the answer, or
the complete answer.
I'm doing a research about DBMSs that run on
17 matches
Mail list logo
