Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2011-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Based on this list, a global exclude for "*.exe" and "lib*dll.def" >> seems reasonable. > > We already have finer-grained excludes for various lib*dll.def > variations in the libpq

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2011-06-09 at 16:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Based on this list, a global exclude for "*.exe" and "lib*dll.def" > seems reasonable. We already have finer-grained excludes for various lib*dll.def variations in the libpq and ecpg subdirectories. Those should be cleaned up if we are a

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 09 12:57:46 -0400 2011: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > I agree with that, though the *dll.def files are ours and probably > > deserve a global .gitignore entry. > > Agreed, and that's done. Oh, I see ... I haven't gotten the commit message yet. -- Álva

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > I agree with that, though the *dll.def files are ours and probably > deserve a global .gitignore entry. Agreed, and that's done. > As for executables, I think the local .gitignore files in each subdir > should be tweaked so that they catch the .exe extension, so > src/ba

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 09 09:42:02 -0400 2011: > =?UTF-8?Q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= writes: > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> What's "nbproject"? > > > Just configuration from some editor. It looks like any move in project > > creates this

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:40, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 06/09/2011 10:25 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> Based on this list, a global exclude for "*.exe" and "lib*dll.def" >> seems reasonable. Andrew, does that seem right to you as well? > > > That plus an entry in src/backend/.gitignore for

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
Magnus Hagander Thursday 09 of June 2011 16:25:07 > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Radosław Smogura wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura > >> > >> wrote: > >>> After compilation I got big list of differences abo

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/09/2011 10:25 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Based on this list, a global exclude for "*.exe" and "lib*dll.def" seems reasonable. Andrew, does that seem right to you as well? That plus an entry in src/backend/.gitignore for "/postgres.def". cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mail

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Radosław Smogura wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura >> wrote: >>> >>> After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other >>> files. You may see it in patch. >>

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:40, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 06/09/2011 08:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura >>  wrote: >>> >>> After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other >>> files. You may see it in patch. >> >> Hmm. D

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?Q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= writes: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> What's "nbproject"? > Just configuration from some editor. It looks like any move in project > creates this entry in .gitignore If you've got random third-party tools that clutter the sou

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? I know msvc b

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/09/2011 08:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? Yes, indeed. I know

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura wrote: After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? I know msvc b

Re: [HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura wrote: > After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other > files. You may see it in patch. Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? I know msvc builds out-of-tree, but mingw doesn't, iirc? WHere do the EX

[HACKERS] .gitignore for some of cygwin files

2011-06-08 Thread Radosław Smogura
After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other files. You may see it in patch. Regards, Radekdiff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index 81c4d5e..75e1d9a --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ lcov.info *.vcproj win32ver.rc