[HACKERS] 答复: [HACKERS] 答复: GiST API Adancement

penalty. What do yo mean by choosing subtree function? There will be more questions coming, hope you will be comfortable with that~ Best wishes. -- Dong 发件人: Andrew Borodin 发送时间: 2017年6月16日 16:48:04 收件人: Tom Lane 抄送: Yuan Dong; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] 答复: GiST API Adancement

2017-06-16 17:06 GMT+03:00 Tom Lane : > Yuan Dong writes: >> ·¢¼þÈË: Andrew Borodin >>> I think there is one more aspect of development: backward >>> compatibility: it's impossible to update all existing extensions. This >>> is not that major feature to ignore them. > >> I should still maintain o

Re: [HACKERS] 答复: GiST API Adancement

Yuan Dong writes: > ·¢¼þÈË: Andrew Borodin >> I think there is one more aspect of development: backward >> compatibility: it's impossible to update all existing extensions. This >> is not that major feature to ignore them. > I should still maintain original API of GiST after modification. To pu

[HACKERS] 答复: GiST API Adancement

Hi Andrey, Thank you for your suggestion. I should still maintain original API of GiST after modification. -- Dong 发件人: Andrew Borodin 发送时间: 2017年6月16日 6:24:03 收件人: Yuan Dong 抄送: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org 主题: Re: GiST API Adancement Hi, Dong! 2017-0