Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Didn't we want to remove that option?
> >
> > I didn't know it was still in there. I see no reason for it.
>
> How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it? Or
On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Didn't we want to remove that option?
>
> I didn't know it was still in there. I see no reason for it.
How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it? Or is that
something other than the new de
