Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > * a workable pipe replacement
>
> I don't have 'pipe' mentioned on the win32 patch. Can you
> give details?
Yeah you do. The second point under "Problems with select()".
Basically, the Win32 call to pipe() returns a file descriptor which is
invalid to pass on to W
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> just a small note to anyone who is interested in the status of this port.
>
> Firstly, the fork/exec changes are coming along well. The first patch, for
> fork/exec'ing of backends has been accepted and applied. A second patch, for
> fork/exec'ing of the rem
