Tom Lane wrote:
> I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
> about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
> of effort.
pg_upgrade
--
Serguei A. Mokhov| /~\The ASCII
Computer Science Department | \ / Ribbon Campaign
Conc
Thanks to all replies on this thread over last few days, many good point
and useful contributions, thank you.
[Please excuse many non-replies, since I've been ill.]
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:41 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > - What are you working towards? Performance? Stability? X?
>
> X, definite
Simon,
Welcome back! Ready to get to work? I need to talk to you about some
stuff
> - When is the next release due?
Each of our previous 4 releases has taken between 11 and 14 months. So,
early 2006 would not be unlikely; however, we have set no dates yet.
> - What will be in relea
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 15:42 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
'06, with freeze in January of '06 (12 month d
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 15:42 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
> on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
> '06, with freeze in January of '06 (12 month dev, 6 month beta) ...
> subject to chan
I would agree that since we have a number of commercial developers who
do have intentions of working on specific items in 8.1, it would be nice
to list those items somewhere (the urgent section of the TODO seems
fine), but it is up to those developers to speak up.
I'd like to bundle pg_dump and pg_
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 05:34, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm giving a talk next week on PostgreSQL 8, so I would like some input
> from the community on a few issues, so that my answers are as close to
> majority opinion as possible.
>
> One of the most frequent set of questions I get asked is around the
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > - When is the next release due?
>
> Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
> on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
> '06, with freeze in January of '06 (
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Simon Riggs wrote:
- When is the next release due?
Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
'06, with freeze in January of '06 (12 month dev, 6 month beta) ...
subject t
