On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
> 2015/06/05 6:43、Robert Haas のメール：
>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
>> Neat idea. This ties into something I've thought about and mentioned
>> before: what if the innerrel is local, but there's a replicated copy
>> o
2015/06/05 6:43、Robert Haas のメール：
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> Neat idea. This ties into something I've thought about and mentioned
> before: what if the innerrel is local, but there's a replicated copy
> on the remote server? Perhaps both cases are worth thinking
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> >> Neat idea. This ties into something I've thought about and mentioned
> >> before: what if the innerrel is local, but there's a replicated copy
> >> on the remote server? Perhaps both cases are worth thinking about at
> >> some point.
>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
>> Neat idea. This ties into something I've thought about and mentioned
>> before: what if the innerrel is local, but there's a replicated copy
>> on the remote server? Perhaps both cases are worth thinking about at
>> some point.
>>
> I think
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> > Yesterday, JPUG held an unconference event at Tokyo, and
> > Hanada-san had a talk about join-pushdown feature of
> > postgres_fdw.
> > At this talk, someone proposed an interesting idea to
> > make join pushdown more aggressive/effective
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> Yesterday, JPUG held an unconference event at Tokyo, and
> Hanada-san had a talk about join-pushdown feature of
> postgres_fdw.
> At this talk, someone proposed an interesting idea to
> make join pushdown more aggressive/effective.
> Let me s
Hi,
Yesterday, JPUG held an unconference event at Tokyo, and
Hanada-san had a talk about join-pushdown feature of
postgres_fdw.
At this talk, someone proposed an interesting idea to
make join pushdown more aggressive/effective.
Let me share it with pgsql-hackers.
He said, we may have a workload t
