Re: [HACKERS] [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module

2015-04-24 Thread Stephen Frost
Dean, * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 24 April 2015 at 04:31, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Christian Ullrich (ch...@chrullrich.net) wrote: > >> * Stephen Frost wrote: > >> >RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module > >> > >> The buildfarm says that with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS,

Re: [HACKERS] [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module

2015-04-24 Thread Dean Rasheed
On 24 April 2015 at 04:31, Stephen Frost wrote: > Christian, > > * Christian Ullrich (ch...@chrullrich.net) wrote: >> * Stephen Frost wrote: >> >> >RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module >> >> The buildfarm says that with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, the RLS >> violations get blamed on the wrong tab

Re: [HACKERS] [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module

2015-04-23 Thread Stephen Frost
Christian, * Christian Ullrich (ch...@chrullrich.net) wrote: > * Stephen Frost wrote: > > >RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module > > The buildfarm says that with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, the RLS > violations get blamed on the wrong tables. Mostly, they are catalogs > (I have seen pg_opclass,

Re: [HACKERS] [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module

2015-04-23 Thread Christian Ullrich
* Stephen Frost wrote: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module The buildfarm says that with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, the RLS violations get blamed on the wrong tables. Mostly, they are catalogs (I have seen pg_opclass, pg_am, and pg_amproc), but some also come up with binary garbage instea