Re: [HACKERS] [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml"

2006-05-03 Thread Nikolay Samokhvalov
Actually, project mentioned on Oleg's page is only in plan. I see some gap between current moment and the moment when GiST will come to power for XML support - check out my proposal (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00044.php), the 'minumum' list is that gap. When we will h

Re: [HACKERS] [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml"

2006-05-03 Thread Nikolay Samokhvalov
Yes, there is no single way, because there are different tasks. There are many papers on this theme. I'm pretty sure that first of all we need to analyze other DBMSes' experience. I'm working on it, analyzing MS, ORA and DB2 (first results of analysis will be available in several weeks). I've su

Re: [HACKERS] [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml"

2006-05-03 Thread Jonah H. Harris
On 5/3/06, Robert Staudinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on your summer of code page [1] you outline a project "XML improvements". Is there any relation (similar goals, feature overlapping, technical relation) to the "pgxml" project mentioned for some time on [2]? No, the XML project idea submit

[HACKERS] [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml"

2006-05-03 Thread Robert Staudinger
Hello, on your summer of code page [1] you outline a project "XML improvements". Is there any relation (similar goals, feature overlapping, technical relation) to the "pgxml" project mentioned for some time on [2]? I have been (remotely) following Oleg Bartunov's page on GiST usage and datatypes