On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> I was looking at that last night. It seems like we could a
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did this, and changed the foreign keys to use it, but I haven't managed
> to build a fk case where I could actually detect a change in the plan
> chosen. Since the queries are only a simple scan on the one table I'm
> wondering if it's basically just m
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> I was looking at that last night. It seems like we could add a LIMIT at
> > >> least in some contexts. In the case
