"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 5. Ignore the current code which allows functions to return multiple
>> results as expressions; we can leave it there, but deprecate it with the
>> intention of eventual removal.
> What does the current 'setof' pl/pgsql business actually _d
> Do we want this feature?
> -
> Based on the many posts on this topic, I think the answer to this is a
> resounding yes.
Definitely!
> How do we want the feature to behave?
> -
> A SRF should
I've been reading past threads, studying backend code, reviewing Alex
Pilosov's "cursor foo" patch (submitted last August/September, but never
applied), and conversing off list with a few people regarding a possible
implementation of Set Returning Functions (or SRF for short). Below is
my prop
