Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
> > I propose the following specification:
> >
> > regexp_replace(source text, pattern text, replacement text, [flags
text])
> > returns text
> >
> > The flags can use the following values:
> > g: global (replace all)
> > i: ignore case
> >
> > When th
Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
> I think that it is good to specify the flags by one character as well
> as Perl.
>
> I propose the following specification:
>
> regexp_replace(source text, pattern text, replacement text, [flags text])
> returns text
>
> The flags can use the following values:
> g: global
Tom Flavel wrote:
> On 08/06/2005 21:57:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > >
> > > surely somthing like
> > >
> > > foo_replace (source text, pattern text, replacement text, flags
text)
> > > returns text
> > >
> > > would fit the bill. OK, it reflects my Perl prejudices, but
On 08/06/2005 21:57:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Atsushi Ogawa said:
> > >
> > > How about changing the function name of each usage?
> > >
> > > regexp_replace:replace first
> > > regexp_replace_all:replace all
> > > regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Atsushi Ogawa said:
> >
> > How about changing the function name of each usage?
> >
> > regexp_replace:replace first
> > regexp_replace_all:replace all
> > regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
> > regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and case i
Atsushi Ogawa said:
>
> How about changing the function name of each usage?
>
> regexp_replace:replace first
> regexp_replace_all:replace all
> regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
> regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and case insensitive
>
That's just horrible. T
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 10:57, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
> > > My idea is opposite. I think that the regexp_replace() should make
> > > "replace all" a default. Because the replace() of pgsql replaces all
> > > strin
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 10:57, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
> > My idea is opposite. I think that the regexp_replace() should make
> > "replace all" a default. Because the replace() of pgsql replaces all
> > string, and regexp_replace() of ora
On K, 2005-06-08 at 21:32 +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
>
> How about changing the function name of each usage?
>
> regexp_replace:replace first
> regexp_replace_all:replace all
> regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
> regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and cas
David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > Ogawa-san,
> > >
> > > I think that this would be a case for function overloading:
> > >
> > > function regexp_replace(
> > > string text, pattern text, replacement text
> > > ) R
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
>
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
> > > David Fetter wrote:
> > > > We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for
> > > > using second and later regex matches "()" in t
David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for
> > > using second and later regex matches "()" in the replacement
> > > pattern.
> > >
> > > The function is misnamed. It sho
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
> > >
> > > We don't yet have this functionality,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
> >
> > We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
> > second and later regex matches "()" in
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
>
> We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
> second and later regex matches "()" in the replacement pattern.
>
> The
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
second and later regex matches "()" in the replacement pattern.
The function is misnamed. It should be
16 matches
Mail list logo
