Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl

2006-11-13 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I wrote: [moving to -hackers] I wrote: I have made some progress with what I think is needed to have two interpreters for plperl. This is a lot harder than the pltcl case for two reasons: 1. there are no restrictions on having 2 tcl interpreters, and 2. tcl does not need to save and rest

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl

2006-11-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[moving to -hackers] I wrote: I have made some progress with what I think is needed to have two interpreters for plperl. This is a lot harder than the pltcl case for two reasons: 1. there are no restrictions on having 2 tcl interpreters, and 2. tcl does not need to save and restore contex