Actually, can we now say we only support OS/X 10.3 and later. If so, we
can use the patch unchanged.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Ah, I already had this on the TODO list with URLs, so I will not put it
> in the hold queue.
Ah, I already had this on the TODO list with URLs, so I will not put it
in the hold queue.
---
Chris Campbell wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.
The Darwin dlopen() patch has already been applied. Where are we on the
Bonjour patch? Do we want code that works on Darwin 10.2 and 10.3?
---
Chris Campbell wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Looks
Chris Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support
>> just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen.
> Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back-
> po
On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote:
Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support
just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen.
Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back-
port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches?
Chris Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mac OS X has included dlopen() and friends etc since Mac OS X 10.3.
> The attached patch switches to using those APIs in src/backend/port/
> dynloader/darwin.c (and passes "make check").
Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 suppo
