On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:41 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Paesold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > >I'm not a particularly big fan of this though because, while I'd
> > >like to be able to give TRUNCATE permissions I'm not a big fan of SET
> > >RELIABILITY because i
* Michael Paesold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> >I'm not a particularly big fan of this though because, while I'd
> >like to be able to give TRUNCATE permissions I'm not a big fan of SET
> >RELIABILITY because it would affect PITR backups.
>
> As far as I have understood the
Stephen Frost wrote:
I'm not a particularly big fan of this though because, while I'd
like to be able to give TRUNCATE permissions I'm not a big fan of SET
RELIABILITY because it would affect PITR backups.
As far as I have understood the discussion... with WAL archiving turned on,
the whole RE
Tom, et al,
Sorry for the longish email; if you're most interested in a change to
the ACL system to allow more privileges then skip to the bottom where
I worked up a change to give us more options without much of a
performance impact (I don't think anyway). Personally, I'd prefer that
to overload
