On Nov 27, 2007 6:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And an additional beta might encourage more testing too.
I'm not that sure of this point. I'm really worried about the lack of
people testing 8.3 at the moment. We have really too little feedback.
Perhaps they didn't meet any prob
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We are also talking about catlog changes for 8.3. Are we comfortable
doing catalog changes between the beta and RC?
The catalog changes in question seem entirely safe ... certainly much
more so than this patch ...
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We are also talking about catlog changes for 8.3. Are we comfortable
> > doing catalog changes between the beta and RC?
>
> The catalog changes in question seem entirely safe ... certainly much
> more so than this patch ...
>
> I do
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are also talking about catlog changes for 8.3. Are we comfortable
> doing catalog changes between the beta and RC?
The catalog changes in question seem entirely safe ... certainly much
more so than this patch ...
I do see your point that another bet
Tom Lane wrote:
> Since Simon seems intent on hacking something in there, here is a patch
> that I think is actually sane for improving operator lookup speed.
> This patch caches all lookups, exact or ambiguous (since even the exact
> ones require multiple cache searches in common cases); and behav
