Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new

2004-08-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Do you want any of these added to the TODO? --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > And I forgot to add: > > * Allow dumping/restoring of any number of specific objects and types > > Chris > > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-12 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
OK, everything for pg_dump TODO I can think of: pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore * Add dumping of comments on composite type columns * Add dumping of comments on index columns * Replace crude DELETE FROM way of dumping cleaning of users and groups with separate DROP commands * Add dumping and restori

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Yes, shoot over that the section should contain. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Perhaps. I was also thinking that maybe it's time to combine pg_dumpall > and pg_dump into a single utility. At the moment, I can't see

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Perhaps. I was also thinking that maybe it's time to combine pg_dumpall and pg_dump into a single utility. At the moment, I can't see how pg_dumpall can ever have a -Fc option, since it will be messy to interact with the pg_dump processes. I was thinking a pg_export utility that can output to

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until August 9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If not it can wait until the next major release. It can wait --- it was submitted after feature freeze anyway, and we certainly have more than enough other things t

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
TODO item? --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until August > >>9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If not it > >>can wait until the ne

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until August > 9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If not it > can wait until the next major release. It can wait --- it was submitted after feature freeze anyway, and

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until August 9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If not it can wait until the next major release. If anyone wants the original patch I can supply it.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-08-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Is anyone working on this patch? --- Tom Lane wrote: > "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > >> pg_dump -t s1.t1 -t s2.t2 -- Dump s1.t1 and s2.t2 > > > That's a