Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Are we agreed this is the way we want to control this?
>
> AFAICT, no one except Matt wants this feature at all, so I'd much prefer
> to drop the whole idea. I think it's a insufficiently justified kluge.
Fine. Unless I hear from the non-kludge croud
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Are we agreed this is the way we want to control this?
AFAICT, no one except Matt wants this feature at all, so I'd much prefer
to drop the whole idea. I think it's a insufficiently justified kluge.
regards, tom lane
---(e
Matt Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > If you think that this should be a global option instead of a
> > per-statement one, something like the (undocumented) #option hack might
> > be a good way to specify it; that would give it per-function scope,
> > which see
