"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> I don't know yet why pgbench would be able to affect this, but it's
> repeatable. If anyone's interested in trying to duplicate it, I'll
> post my version of pgbench.
>
I'd like to try to duplicate it here,
Regards,
Qingqing
-
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ... I wonder if it would help for pgbench to
>> fork off multiple sub-processes and have each sub-process tend just one
>> backend.
> I'm not sure multiple sub-processes version of pgbench shows superior
> performance than current implementation because
