Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-15 Thread Tom Lane
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > iMath's protability checks failed. Attached patch drops them > and expects postgres.h to give correct types. > Also enable asserts to fail earlier. Applied, thanks. Looks like this should fix current buildfarm failure on "bear".

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-15 Thread Marko Kreen
On 7/14/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wrote: > Applied, thanks. What I now see is that pgp-pubkey-decrypt passes on > a 32-bit machine but dumps core on a 64-bit machine, with SIGSEGV here: Addendum: seems it only fails without openssl. iMath's protability checks failed. Attached

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-14 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Applied, thanks. What I now see is that pgp-pubkey-decrypt passes on > a 32-bit machine but dumps core on a 64-bit machine, with SIGSEGV here: Addendum: seems it only fails without openssl. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-14 Thread Tom Lane
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 7/13/06, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Marko, can you take a look at what is causing this regression test >> failure? The failing machine is kudu: > Seems you have skipped the CAST5 patch. Could you recheck? Applied, thanks. What I now

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-14 Thread Marko Kreen
On 7/13/06, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marko, can you take a look at what is causing this regression test failure? The failing machine is kudu: Seems you have skipped the CAST5 patch. Could you recheck? -- marko ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:57 -0400, Marko Kreen wrote: >> Few cleanups and couple of new things [...] > Applied, thanks for the patch. This has broken two out of the four buildfarm members that reported in the last half hour :-( I think kudu does not like

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-12 Thread Neil Conway
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 00:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > This has broken two out of the four buildfarm members that reported > in the last half hour :-( I think kudu does not like // comments, > not sure what kookaburra is on about. BTW, you've switched your animal names :) I fixed the C++-style comm