On Thursday, November 15, 2012 7:30 PM Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> Okay.
>> So as Robert and Alvaro suggested to have it separate utility rather than
>> having options in pg_resetxlog to print MAX LSN seems to be quite
>> appropriate.
>> I am planning
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Okay.
> So as Robert and Alvaro suggested to have it separate utility rather than
> having options in pg_resetxlog to print MAX LSN seems to be quite
> appropriate.
> I am planning to update the patch to make it a separate utility as
> pg_comp
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:19 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > Now user can use this utility to decide if new-standby has max LSN
> greater
>
> > And that situation can occur when new-standby has startpoint LSN
> greater
> > than new-maste
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Now user can use this utility to decide if new-standby has max LSN greater
> than max LSN of new-master he needs to use fullback-up on new-standby. Is my
> understanding right?
No. The maximum LSN of data pages in new-standby should be compar
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:12 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:17 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Amit kapila
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, November 12, 2012 9:56 PM Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:17 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Amit kapila
>> wrote:
>> > On Monday, November 12, 2012 9:56 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > Robert Haas escribió:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 A
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Without this utility, it's difficult to calculate the maximum LSN of
>> data page, so
>> basically we needed to take a backup when starting the standby. In the
>> future,
>> thanks to th
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:17 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Amit kapila
> wrote:
> > On Monday, November 12, 2012 9:56 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Robert Haas escribió:
> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila
> wrote:
> >
> >>> >> I think I can see all
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Without this utility, it's difficult to calculate the maximum LSN of
> data page, so
> basically we needed to take a backup when starting the standby. In the future,
> thanks to this utility, we can calculate the maximum LSN, and can skip a
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Amit kapila wrote:
> On Monday, November 12, 2012 9:56 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>
>>> >> I think I can see all of those things being potentially useful. There
>>> >> are a couple of pe
On Monday, November 12, 2012 9:56 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>> >> I think I can see all of those things being potentially useful. There
>> >> are a couple of pending patches that will revise the WAL format
>> >> slightly;
Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:18:11AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I will
> > move all the open patches to CF3, unless someone beats me to it. I
> > probably won't be able to get anything done tomorrow, so if somebody has
> > a boring Sunday I would appreciate the help.
>
>
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
> >> I think I can see all of those things being potentially useful. There
> >> are a couple of pending patches that will revise the WAL format
> >> slightly; not sure how much those are likely to interfere with any
> >>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>>> Based on the discussion and suggestions in this mail chain, following
>>> features can be implemented:
>>>
>>> 1. To compute the value of max LSN in data pages based on user input
>>> whether he wants it for an individual
>
>>> file, a par
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:18:11AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit kapila wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:19 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > This patch is now marked Returned with Feedback in the CF, but I see no
> > > on-list feedback. Did some review happen?
> >
> > No review happen
Amit kapila wrote:
>
> On Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:19 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > This patch is now marked Returned with Feedback in the CF, but I see no
> > on-list feedback. Did some review happen?
>
> No review happened for this patch.
> It has returned due to slight confusion thinking tha
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:19 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> This patch is now marked Returned with Feedback in the CF, but I see no
> on-list feedback. Did some review happen?
No review happened for this patch.
It has returned due to slight confusion thinking that this is same as:
Patch for opti
This patch is now marked Returned with Feedback in the CF, but I see no
on-list feedback. Did some review happen?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>> Based on the discussion and suggestions in this mail chain, following
>> features can be implemented:
>>
>> 1. To compute the value of max LSN in data pages based on user input whether
>> he wants it for an individual
>> file, a particular directory or whole database.
>>
>> 2a. To search t
19 matches
Mail list logo
