On 2 October 2017 at 05:27, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 15 Sep 2017, at 13:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> >> On 01 Sep 2017, at 14:28, Aleksander Alekseev <
> a.aleks...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> >> make in
> On 15 Sep 2017, at 13:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> On 01 Sep 2017, at 14:28, Aleksander Alekseev
>> wrote:
>>
>> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
>> make installcheck-world: not tested
>> Implements feature: not tested
>> Spec compliant:
> On 01 Sep 2017, at 14:28, Aleksander Alekseev
> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: not tested
> Implements feature: not tested
> Spec compliant: not tested
> Documentation:not tested
>
> H
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Hi Craig,
I'm afraid patches 0002 and 0003 don't apply anymore. Could you pl
On 9 March 2017 at 11:17, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've found a minor off-by-one error in the resource retention logic
> for logical slots, where we treat confirmed_flush as meaning "flushed
> up to and including this LSN". Seems reasonable, but the rest of the
> code treats it as "flushed
Hi all
I've found a minor off-by-one error in the resource retention logic
for logical slots, where we treat confirmed_flush as meaning "flushed
up to and including this LSN". Seems reasonable, but the rest of the
code treats it as "flushed up to but excluding this LSN". In
particular, we treat co
