On 2017-03-10 18:14:13 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2017-03-08 19:18:04 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
> >> the Greenplum code base over here
> >
> > I
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-03-08 19:18:04 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
>> the Greenplum code base over here
>
> I think the change makes sense. Any chance we could convince you to
>
Hi,
On 2017-03-08 19:18:04 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
> the Greenplum code base over here
I think the change makes sense. Any chance we could convince you to
bring up an arm64 buildfarm animal (our test infrastructure) up, so
Andres Freund writes:
> FWIW, Unless somebody seriously protests, I'm going to commit this soon-ish.
Sure, if you want to take responsibility for it, push away.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to y
On 2017-03-10 10:29:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
> >> the Greenplum code base over here:
> >> https://git
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
>> the Greenplum code base over here:
>> https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/1983
+1.
> Thanks. Please ad
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
> the Greenplum code base over here:
> https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/1983
Thanks. Please add this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/ so
it doesn't get
Hi!
I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
the Greenplum code base over here:
https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/1983
While it is true that 64 bit atomics are mostly a no-op
for Postgres right now, perhaps this patch could still
be useful.
To make it easier to
