(2013/07/19 22:03), Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-07-19 08:57:01 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
I had the idea they were used for a client-side implementation of WHERE
CURRENT OF. Perhaps that's dead code and could be removed entirely?
It's been reported that ODBC still uses them.
Though Postg
On 2013-07-19 08:57:01 +0900, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> >>I had the idea they were used for a client-side implementation of WHERE
> >>CURRENT OF. Perhaps that's dead code and could be removed entirely?
> >
> >It's been reported that ODBC still uses them.
>
> Though PostgreSQL's TID is similar to Or
(2013/07/18 23:54), Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
1. snapshot-error-v1.patch introduces a new special snapshot, called
SnapshotError. In the cases where we set SnapshotNow as a sort of
default snapshot, this patch changes the code to
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Ah, yeah, that does show up. I had grepped for 'currtid_'. Sorry.
> They're all in positioned_load() in results.c.
Well, in that case, we'll have to keep it around. I still wish we
could get a clear answer to the question of how it's be
Andres Freund escribió:
> On 2013-07-18 12:01:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> > > They don't show up in a quick grep of psqlodbc's source code, FWIW.
> >
> > Hmm. Maybe we should just remove them and see if anyone complains.
> > We c
On 2013-07-18 12:01:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > They don't show up in a quick grep of psqlodbc's source code, FWIW.
>
> Hmm. Maybe we should just remove them and see if anyone complains.
> We could always put them back (or make the
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> They don't show up in a quick grep of psqlodbc's source code, FWIW.
Hmm. Maybe we should just remove them and see if anyone complains.
We could always put them back (or make them available via contrib) if
it's functionality someone actual
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> >> 1. snapshot-error-v1.patch introduces a new special snapshot, called
> >> SnapshotError. In the cases where we set SnapshotNow as a sort of
> >> default snapshot, this patch changes the code to
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> 1. snapshot-error-v1.patch introduces a new special snapshot, called
>> SnapshotError. In the cases where we set SnapshotNow as a sort of
>> default snapshot, this patch changes the code to use SnapshotError
>> instead.
Robert Haas writes:
> 1. snapshot-error-v1.patch introduces a new special snapshot, called
> SnapshotError. In the cases where we set SnapshotNow as a sort of
> default snapshot, this patch changes the code to use SnapshotError
> instead. This affects scan->xs_snapshot in genam.c and
> estate->e
10 matches
Mail list logo
