Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:56:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> GNUe will break, as well. > > I'm willing to implement whatever clever solution we all come up with. > > If you need help in inventing a solution, it'd be a good idea to explain > the

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> GNUe will break, as well. > I'm willing to implement whatever clever solution we all come up with. If you need help in inventing a solution, it'd be a good idea to explain the problem. Personally I'm not familiar with GNUe ...

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:03:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > GNUe will break, as well. > > Do I hear a volunteer to fix it? I'm willing to implement whatever clever solution we all come up with. I'll have to coordinate w/ the GNUe IRC folks to g

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it would be much faster simply to list of the programs that > use Postgresql internals that won't break. Approximately none, I'm sure :-(. This thread isn't about that, it's about stirring up the troops to fix everything that must be fixed.

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GNUe will break, as well. Do I hear a volunteer to fix it? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Rod Taylor
;Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:28 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers > On Wed,

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:05:23AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > phpPgAdmin (WebDB) will be broken as well. I think myself and at least a > few other committers lurk here tho. > > Other things that will break: > > TOra > Various KDE interfaces GNUe will break, as well. Ross

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> > JDBC and ODBC metadata code is certainly broken; so are the > > catalog lookups in pgaccess, pgadmin, and so on. psql and > > pg_dump are broken as well (though I will take responsibility > > for fixing pg_dump, and will then look at psql if no one else > > has done it by then). I'm not even

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers

2002-04-30 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 April 2002 18:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers > > > Current CVS tip has most of the needed infrastructure for > SQL-spec schem