Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] killing process question

2002-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Johnson, Shaunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --okay, but the client has since terminated > --it's session (if i understand you correctly). > --is this just something that will just have to > --hang around until i shutdown the database / boot > --the machine? I dunno. Are you sure this is a b

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] killing process question

2002-09-19 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 19 Sep 2002 at 11:49, Tom Lane wrote: > "Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say? > > No. > > It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client. OK. But what if it never reads anything

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] killing process question

2002-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say? No. It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] killing process question

2002-09-19 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 19 Sep 2002 at 11:19, Johnson, Shaunn wrote: > > --howdy: > --not that the process is doing a lot or taking up > --a lot of resources, it's just something > --that i allow the users to kill and then > --it get's passed to me for correction if the > --simple 'kill ' thing doesn't work. > --wha