Tom Lane writes:
> Hmm. I don't think we have any code in there to prohibit the same
> object from being made a member of two different extensions ... but this
> example suggests that maybe we had better check that.
I see you did take care of that, thank you!
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > If I drop the extension veil_demo, I am left with the veil_demo version
> > of veil_init().
>
> > Is this a feature or a bug? Is there a work-around?
>
> Hmm. I don't think we have any code in there to prohibit the same
> object from being
Marc Munro writes:
> In postgres 9.1 I have created 2 extensions, veil and veil_demo. When I
> install veil, it creates a default (not very useful) version of a
> function: veil_init().
> When I create veil_demo, it replaces this version of the function with
> it's own (useful) version.
> If I
