Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:34:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> > much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
> >
> Personally I'm against
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've done quite well with the current setup, so I don't see a need to
> tinker with it. I've always found the Reply-to-enabled lists I'm on to
> be a more lossy medium.
The basic issue is that the current setup encourages
reply-to-author-and-list,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but
> not so much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on
> it ...
Please, please, please, please don't. The choice of the reply path lies
with the author or the replier, not with an inter
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
I think we've discussed this in the past, and the consensus has always
been that more people like it
