Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines

2005-11-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: bigtest: ! $(SHELL) ./pg_regress --schedule=$(srcdir)/serial_schedule --multibyte=$(MULTIBYTE) --load-language=plpgsql numeric_big $(NOLOCALE) bigcheck: ! $(SHELL) ./pg_regress --temp-install --top-builddir=$(top_builddir) --temp-port=$(TEMP_PORT

Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales]

2005-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This has refreshed my fading memory. The patch seems like the best > solution. Is there any objection to applying it? Putting the switch at the end seems certain to fail on some platforms (some versions of getopt are fussier than others). > bigtes

[HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales]

2005-11-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
This has refreshed my fading memory. The patch seems like the best solution. Is there any objection to applying it? (Petr, I assume you intended to send this to a mailing list also) cheers andrew Original Message Subject: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines wit