Barry,
Never mind.
Patch with 'begin;set autocommit to on;commit' work fine for JDBC spec.
regards,
Haris Peco
On Friday 11 October 2002 02:57 am, Barry Lind wrote:
> Did anything come of this discussion on whether SET initiates a
> transaction or not?
>
> In summary what is the right way to deal
Barry Lind wrote:
> Did anything come of this discussion on whether SET initiates a
> transaction or not?
SET does not start a multi-statement transaction when autocommit is off.
> In summary what is the right way to deal with setting autocommit in clients?
I guess just 'set autocommit to on'
Did anything come of this discussion on whether SET initiates a
transaction or not?
In summary what is the right way to deal with setting autocommit in clients?
thanks,
--Barry
Original Message
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Patch for handling "autocommit=false" in postgresql.conf
Date
