Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ie. why can't we just record the number of locks each backend has, sort
> of, and use a reference counting sort of method. Per-backend in case
> the backend dies and we need to discount those locks..?
Uh ... the interesting question is usual
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just random speculation, but could we use a pg_subtrans-like setup to do
> row share locks?
pg_subtrans is trivial to index --- it's a linear array subscripted by
TransactionId. I'm not sure what we'd do to handle row locks, which
would need
Just random speculation, but could we use a pg_subtrans-like setup to do
row share locks?
ie. Store them in a sort of table to avoid the problems with limited
shared memory size?
Chris
Tom Lane wrote:
Log Message:
---
Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as per recent discussion. pg_subtrans
